🔗 Share this article

A digital rights group has claimed to have harvested millions of tracks from Spotify and is getting ready to release them online.

Potential Impetus for Artificial Intelligence Development

Observers said the apparent data breach could boost AI companies searching for material to train their technology.

An entity called Anna’s Archive said it had scraped 86 million audio tracks from the platform and 256 million rows of metadata such as artist and album names. The company, which hosts more than 100 million songs, stated that the leak did not constitute its entire inventory.

“We have identified and deactivated the nefarious user accounts that engaged in unlawful scraping,” said a Spotify representative.

The Swedish company, which has more than 700 million subscribers worldwide, added that an inquiry into unauthorized access identified a external actor collected public metadata and employed questionable tactics to bypass DRM [digital rights management].

Archive's Declared Goal and Concerns

Spotify does not believe the music acquired by Anna’s Archive has been made public yet. Anna’s Archive, which is known for offering links to copyright-infringing books, wrote in a blog it wanted to create a ‘historical repository’ for music.

The group asserted the audio files accounted for 99.6% of all music listened to by Spotify users and would be shared via ‘torrents’, a method of sharing large data files online.

“Of course Spotify doesn’t have all the music in the world, but it’s a fantastic beginning,” said Anna’s Archive, which frames its mission as “safeguarding humanity’s information and heritage”.

Model Development and Intellectual Property Debate

Ed Newton-Rex for protecting artists’ rights, said the leaked music would probably be utilized for training artificial intelligence systems.

“Training on illegally sourced material is unfortunately common in the AI industry, so this stolen music is highly likely to end up training AI models,” he stated.

The group's website makes references to LibGen, a huge online archive of copyrighted books that has allegedly been leveraged by the parent company of Facebook to develop its systems.

The co-founder of an AI startup posted on LinkedIn that members of the public could in principle “build their own personal free equivalent of Spotify”. The executive said it could also allow technology firms to “train on modern music at a large volume”.

Intellectual property law has become a key issue between creatives, authors and creatives on one side and AI companies on the other.

Government Considerations and Responses

In the UK, creative professionals have raised concerns against a ministerial suggestion to allow AI companies use copyright-protected work without consent unless the rights holder opts out. Virtually every respondent to a government consultation on the idea has supported artists’ concerns.

The secretary of state for science, research and development informed parliament this month there was “little consensus” on the issue, adding that ministers would “take the time to get this correct”. The government has pledged to make regulatory plans on AI and copyright by next year.